What can the board chair do if a regularly appointed panel member is unavailable?

The option to designate an alternate panel member is the correct response because it ensures that the meeting can continue without significant disruption, maintaining the integrity and functioning of the board. In many formal settings, particularly in regulatory or governance contexts, having an alternate allows for a complete and effective decision-making process, as it provides continuity in representation and expertise.

Choosing to designate an alternate panel member is aligned with the operational needs of boards or panels where the absence of a regular member could lead to delays or an inability to reach a quorum. This mechanism is in place to enhance efficiency and ensure that the panel can fulfill its responsibilities without interruption.

Other options, such as canceling the meeting or postponing it until the member returns, could hinder the board's functionality and lead to unnecessary delays in decision-making. Proceeding without that member might compromise the board's decisions if the absence will influence the outcome, particularly if the absent member possesses crucial knowledge or expertise. Thus, designating an alternate provides a practical solution that keeps the focus on maintaining the board's productivity and effectiveness.